Innovative Legal Services For Your 21st Century Needs

Trademark Basics Explained In Plain English

 

Trademark law is a complex web of federal laws dating back to 1870. Trademark law covers words, phrases, logos, sounds, colors, and other ways businesses want to set themselves apart from their competitors and others in the marketplace. With the expansion of the internet and the ability to do business much more easily on a national and global scale, trademark protection has become more important to businesses of all size. The challenge has been that as the barriers to commerce have come down, legal barriers still exist and need to be considered.

To help you better understand some of the basics of trademark laws, how they work, and some of the issues I’ve put together answers in plain English to frequently asked questions. Trademark laws are not written in plain English, yet you’re required to know how it all works.

Trademark Laws Explained In Plain English

 

  1. What is a trademark?

Generally, a trademark is a word, phrase, logo, symbol, or character, or a combination thereof, used in connection with goods and services distributed in interstate commerce that serve to identify the source of the products or services and distinguish it from competitors. What this means is that pretty much anything can be put forth as a trademark, so long as it is not obscene. Colors and color patterns have received a federal registration (ex.: the pink for Owens Corning insulation, the plaid design of Scotch tape and blue color for painter’s tape from 3M), as well as sounds which are known as sound marks (ex.: NBC chimes, Lucasfilms THX Deep Note).

  1. Can any trademark get registered?

In theory the answer is “Yes.” However, in reality, the answer is “No.” You can submit a registration of your mark, but the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reviews registrations to ensure that they meet the requirements set forth in the Lanham Act. There are a host of guidelines that are followed to ensure that a mark meets all the defined criteria before it can be registered.

  1. What is a service mark?

A service mark is a special designation for marks that are specifically related to the offering of a service rather than tangible goods.

  1. What is the difference between the TM, SM, and ®?

The “TM”, which is an abbreviation for trademark, can be used at any time when you want to assert trademark rights to your word, phrase, logo, symbol, etc for goods. It does not have significant legal meaning since trademark rights can be asserted at any time prior to registration under the common law doctrine of trademark rights. By using the mark in the ordinary course of business, a business would obtain common law rights. Common law rights vary in degree and may or may not confer any significant protection.

The “SM” is carries all the same rights as the “TM” except it’s used for services and not goods.

The ® means the mark has received federal registration from the USPTO and is in good standing. Keep in mind that if the registration is abandoned or cancelled the ® designation should no longer be used with the mark.

  1. How are trademark rights obtained?

In the US, Canada, and United Kingdom (and most former British Commonwealth countries), the general rule is “first to use” whereas in most other countries they use the “first to file” rule. Keep in mind, though, that just because you were the first to use the mark it doesn’t mean someone else is prohibited from filing a registration with the USPTO before you and seek to register the same or similar mark. If that happens, be prepared to hire an attorney to begin the process of opposing their registration.

  1. Where do I register my trademark?

Registration can be had at both the state and federal level. While federal registration with the USPTO is the highest level of registration, it requires that a mark be or intended to be used in interstate commerce. If the mark is only used within a single state, federal registration would not be permitted. In that case, a business or individual may find protection at the state level.

  1. Do I need an attorney to register my trademark?

As an attorney, I should probably say yes you absolutely need an attorney to file for registration of your trademark. However, there is no law requiring an attorney to file the registration with the USPTO or state agency if it’s a state-only mark. That being said, the registration process can be cumbersome to the lay person resulting in delay or refusal for seemingly innocent mistakes. Over half of all non-attorney filings are found to have errors that result in a refusal to register.

  1. What if someone registers my trademark for the same or similar goods or services before I do?

If you begin using a mark first but prior to registering the mark someone else comes along and registers the exact (or very similar) mark, you will need to follow the process to oppose their registration. The USPTO may find your mark in a general internet search, but the examining attorney will not likely refuse the registration based on your common law rights. There is a detailed opposition process that must be followed and you will want to consult an attorney to ensure you follow that process because the consequences of doing it wrong may mean you can not use the trademark you’ve worked hard for.

  1. What if someone already registered the same trademark but for different goods or services?

There are a number of very familiar marks that have been registered by more than one party. I often use Delta as an example since most people are familiar with Delta airlines and Delta faucets. Based on one of the key criteria used for determining if a subsequent mark can register, the examining attorney has to examine the “likelihood of confusion”. Often the question asked is “Would the average consumer be confused as to the origin and source of the goods or services?”. I think you would agree that few people reading or hearing about travel and come across the mark Delta would confuse the airline for the plumbing supply company. Where the goods or services are so unrelated that the average consumer would not be confused about where the goods or services are coming from, different companies can use the same mark.

That being said, federal law permits what are known as “famous marks” and will likely prohibit registrations even though the goods or services are unrelated under trademark anti-dilution laws. While this is a very complex subset of trademark law, the easy explanation is that you likely can’t use a mark as famous as Apple and attach it to your new product regardless of what it is. Even if no reasonable person could be confused about the source of your widgets, there is a presumption that they would be and your registration would be barred. I know your next question, so I’ll answer that too – Can you use the mark even if you don’t register it? Probably not without getting a cease and desist letter from the trademark owner. Maybe you won’t, but it’s definitely a risk you take.

  1. Is there such thing as Fair Use?

Short answer is yes. The long answer is, well, long. Unlike copyright law which has a relatively well-established history and broad use under the doctrine of Fair Use, trademark law does not use the same four-prong test. Under trademark law there are two fair use defenses: nominative fair use (use of the mark to refer to the actual trademarked product, service, or owner), classic fair use (use of the mark to accurately describe an aspect of your product or service), and parody. The defense of Fair Use will likely never be met with understanding or seeing your side of the argument.

  1. Why did I get a Cease and Desist when I see other people using the trademark?

I get this question often and there really is no known answer. It’s like getting stopped for speeding when everyone else around you is speeding too. Trademark owners are required to police their mark and prevent others from misusing their mark or they risk losing the registration. In some cases, the trademark owner is very vigilant because they don’t want inappropriate goods or services associated with their company; whereas another company may not want their mark to become generic (ex.: Xerox and Kleenex). A trademark owner who does not police their mark runs the risk of losing it, so while it may seem like a personal attack it’s just business. If you do get a Cease and Desist letter, you may want to contact a lawyer to find out what, if any, options you may have.

  1. Should my new company care about trademarks?

In a single word, yes! I say this because I’ve seen a number of start-ups get well in to initial marketing and funding only to be hit with a Cease and Desist, or, worse, a trademark infringement lawsuit. If your mark is intrinsically tied to your goods or services budget for legal services and spend the money to know if there are any risks to using the mark. I guarantee that the few thousand you spend up-front will pale in comparison to the tens-of thousands associated with defending a case or abandoning your mark.

  1. Can I stop people from using my trademark for domain names?

In typical lawyer fashion, the answer to this question is “it depends”. Disputes over domain name registration are handled under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy created by ICANN and used by all accredited registrars. The only cases that get fast-tracked to the expedited administrative process are those registrations that are done in bad faith (such as cybersquatting). Regardless of whether the case is fast-tracked or must be resolved through the traditional legal means, the three criteria that must be proven before a domain registration will be cancelled or transferred to the trademark-holder are:

  • The trademark owner owns the mark (does not have to be registered) that is the same or similar to the registered second level domain;
  • The party that registered the domain has no legitimate interest or right in the domain name; AND
  • The domain name was registered and used in bad faith.
  • Just as with filing a complaint with a court, before filing a protest with ICANN you should seek legal counsel to ensure you have the legal right to file.
  1. How long is my trademark valid?

Common law trademarks are valid as long as you use the mark, unless another determination ends that use.

Federal registrations are valid for 10 years, but can be renewed seemingly forever. Keep in mind, however, that during the first 10 years, to keep the mark in good-standing a “Section 8 Affidavit” must be filed during the fifth year of registration. These “Section 8 Affidavit” filings are also required for subsequent term renewals. You will want to keep track of all the important dates to keep your registration valid.

  1. What information do I have to provide in a trademark registration?

The USPTO registration requires information about the mark you want to use, if you’re currently using it or if you intend to use it, a specimen of the mark in use, the date the mark was first used in interstate commerce, the description of the goods or services on which the mark is or will be used, the class of goods or services, as well as information about the person or company claiming ownership.

Since this is public information and you will need to provide a mailing address, if you are a start-up or home-based business you may not want to provide your physical home address and may wish to obtain a mailing address from a third-party mail service provider.

  1. My mark is stylized or includes a specific color, do I have to register the stylization?

Again, short answer and long answer with this one. The short answer is “No.” Protection is granted to unstylized marks just as they are to those that incorporate a certain font, design, color, or stylization. If, however, the color or stylization are integral to the mark (ex., the font for Coca-Cola) you may want to protect both the unstylized mark as well as the stylization.

  1. What does it cost to register a trademark?

The USPTO fees are set by the director under authority from Congress. Fees change periodically and in January 2015 some fees were reduced to account for greater efficiencies.

  1. How do I protect my trademark?

You have to be vigilant but you don’t have to be mean. I say this because I’ve seen my fair share of cease and desist letters received by clients that are just plain rude. With a federally registered mark, you are required to police situations of potential infringement or you risk losing your mark. As mentioned above, there may be instances where you do not seek enforcement but, in general, you will be required to show that you are protecting your intellectual property. In situation of alleged infringement there is no one designated protocol for enforcement. Many will begin with a letter from the company to the alleged infringer asking them to stop using the mark (a friendly “cease and desist” letter). Some will bypass the friendly letter and, instead, begin with a formal Cease and Desist letter from their attorney. Still, there are situations where the only appropriate first step is filing a lawsuit. You may want to discuss which option is best or establish a protocol for your business.

  1. Does the DMCA work for trademarks?

In a word, “No.” The DMCA stands for Digital Millennium Copyright Act and only applies to copyright. There is no equivalent for trademark. This means that there is no “fast track” process for taking down alleged trademark infringement that occurs online.

  1. What is Trademark Infringement?

Trademark infringement is when another person or businesses uses the same or similar mark to one in which you have exclusive rights in such a way that actually creates confusion or has a likelihood of creating confusion among consumers or the public. That sounds very legalese, but what it comes down is that you own the mark and someone else is using it in a way that consumers or the public are confused or could be confused as to who the product or service belongs to. The key phrase is “likelihood of confusion”, which is short for “likely to cause consumer confusion as to the source of those goods or as to the sponsorship or approval of such goods”. Back in 1961 the US Supreme Court set out what criteria would be evaluated to make this determination: (1) the strength of the mark; (2) the proximity of the goods; (3) the similarity of the marks; (4) evidence of actual confusion; (5) the similarity of marketing channels used; (6) the degree of caution exercised by the typical purchaser; (7) the defendant’s intent.

Trademark infringement cases often come down to very specific details. While it’s much more clear when it’s the same mark for substantially similar products or services, the determination often muddles when it’s unrelated goods. Nonetheless, when it comes to famous or well-known trademarks the strength of the mark often outweighs many of the other criteria.

  1. What is Trademark Dilution?

As the word dilution implies, there is a weakening of the trademark by the non-owner that the trademark owner wants to stop. One very important factor in trademark dilution cases is that it only applies to Famous Marks (described below). If the prerequisites have been met, the owner of a mark can bring action against anyone who uses the mark in such as way that dilutes the distinctive quality of the mark either by “blurring” or “tarnishment”.

Blurring occurs when the strength or the mark is weakened because the Famous Mark is associated with dissimilar goods.

Tarnishment occurs when the same mark is used with goods or services that could diminish the mark by being associated with “unsavory” goods, services, or company.

  1. What is a “Famous Mark”?

Honestly, this is one of those where you have to go to court to get the determination that your mark is so well-known it’s “famous”. The term “famous” is not defined in any of the federal trademark statutes but courts do consider a number of different criteria in making their determination. Courts will examine the duration and extent of the mark, the advertising, geographic use, the degree of distinctiveness, how recognized the mark is among the general public, use of the mark by third parties, and whether the mark is registered. Still, with all these criteria, courts may not agree and thus there could be inconsistent decisions.

  1. What does “likelihood of confusion” really mean?

The standard used throughout trademark law is this idea of “likelihood of confusion”. Whether it’s registration or infringement, the use of the mark will be examined as to whether consumers will be confused as to the origin or source of the goods or services. You might say that someone just had to do a little bit of research to find out the company selling the thing, and that may be correct. However, the law doesn’t work that way. There is the pretend person who is clueless about most things and anyone evaluating a trademark against this standard of “likelihood of confusion” uses this pretend person as their baseline. You might think the courts have given guidance as to what we should look for as lay people to determine if there is a likelihood of confusion, but you’d be wrong. While the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has given some guidance, they didn’t set out a standardized test for making this determination. Which makes trademark infringement case quite subjective.

  1. What is an intent-to-use application?

Under US law, to obtain a federal registration for a trademark (or service mark) the mark must be used in interstate commerce. But sometimes you want to make sure the name you love will be available when you go to market and not taken up by someone else while you’re creating your product. So, the intent-to-use application was created to allow for the registration to proceed in tandem with the development. This is often how we find out about those no-so-secret cool tech gadgets on the horizon; because the company has filed a trademark application for the product. While the registration process will move forward, no registration will issue until the USPTO has satisfactory proof that the mark is actually used in commerce.

I hope these have helped you better understand trademark laws and the basics of registering and protecting your trademark. If you are considering registering a trademark, I would be happy to assist you. I have been providing counsel on trademark laws and registration for over 15 years. Please contact me if you’d like to inquire about working with me.

  1. How can people stuff on Etsy with another company’s trademark?

This is a common question and many sites other than Etsy can easily be substituted in that question. Part of the answer is that many people don’t understand that trademark law prohibits them from using someone else’s trademark (especially a registered mark) for their own financial gain. It should be common sense that you don’t get to put Disney on your shirts and sell them. There’s a reason companies license their intellectual property. The other part of the reason is that some people just don’t care what the law says since they believe there is little chance they’ll get caught and even if they do what’s really going to happen. Well, I’ll tell you what’s really going to happen – you can get sued, for a lot of money. Even if they get nothing from you do you really want to deal with a lawsuit? Maybe some people do. So, how can people do this, which is clearly in violation of Etsy’s (and likely any other similar site’s) Terms of Service? Since Etsy does not actively review each listing, there is a self-policing. And just like speeding, sometimes you get caught and sometimes you don’t. But that never makes speeding legal.

I hope these have helped you better understand trademark laws and the basics of registering and protecting your trademark. If you are considering registering a trademark, I would be happy to assist you. I have been providing counsel on trademark laws and registration for over 15 years. Please contact me if you’d like to inquire about working with me.

 

Image Credit

By | 2018-08-27T11:21:53+00:00 March 3rd, 2015|Business Law, Trademark|5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Rena McDaniel-Alz Caregiver March 4, 2015 at 10:45 am - Reply

    This is some really great information, thanks so much!

    • Sara Hawkins March 4, 2015 at 11:26 am - Reply

      Thank you very much, Rena. Glad you found it helpful.

  2. Stephanie @ EntreFamily June 12, 2015 at 3:59 pm - Reply

    Hi Sara, I appreciate your insight into this issue! I would love to understand more about the rights of a company/brand with a registered trademark to legally threaten someone for mentioning their brand by name or sharing a photo of their product via social media (blog, Facebook, Instagram, etc.). I’m talking about use that actually benefits the company, by telling others about their brand, or linking to where to buy something, or simply showing that you use it yourself. In these situations, does a company have any legal right to order someone to remove such photos or mentions from someone’s accounts, blog, etc. that is not affiliate with the company or just a consumer? I know you can’t advise me on a specific issue with a company, but essentially this is what a company is trying to come after me for and I can’t see how this is possibly something that they can enforce legally. Thank you! 🙂

    • Sara Hawkins June 20, 2015 at 3:51 pm - Reply

      No one really has the right to threaten anyone. However, a cease and desist is often viewed as a threat. This is especially true when the letter has a very negative tone or is not legally accurate and takes on a very personal view of the law. The idea that the use of a trademark is beneficial and thus permitted is a serious misconception of trademark law. Just because one uses another’s trademark in a positive light does not mean it is a legal use. That being said, many companies do not employ knowledgeable people to monitor their intellectual property and thus we see examples of a trademark-holder asserting rights without understanding all the laws related to its use by a third-party.

      Does a trademark-holder have the right to order the removal of their mark? Sure, but are there legally permissible defenses to the alleged infringement? The challenge is that defenses are a legal construct and decided by a judge/jury and not by the third-party using the mark. Unfortunately, it’s not a clearly black and while issue with a bright-line rule to wave in the face of a company seeking to stop what it believes to be the infringing use of their mark.

  3. Ann DeWolf November 11, 2015 at 6:20 am - Reply

    I really enjoyed this information on Trademarks and I would like to discuss our site with you. What is the best way to set up a consultation with you?
    Thank you,
    Ann

Leave A Comment